Evaluation of Social Projects, Programmes and Policies

We carry out specialist evaluations of social projects, programmes and policies, systematically examining the evidence to determine whether an intervention is working, how it is working, and what results and impacts it is producing. The service generates knowledge for decision-making, accountability and the continuous improvement of social projects.

The need this service addresses

Many projects end without independent evidence of what changed, for whom and why. Without that evidence, decisions about continuation, accountability to funders and institutional learning rest on impressions.

Who it is for

Civil society organisations, development cooperation agencies, public institutions and companies that implement or fund social projects and need independent evidence of results and impact.

Main activities

Baseline studies
Mid-term and final external evaluations
Impact evaluations and thematic studies
Quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis across all provinces of Mozambique

Baseline Studies

Through baseline studies we help organisations map the initial context before their projects are implemented. The study establishes a starting point and the indicators against which future results will be compared.

Mid-Term External Evaluation

Mid-term evaluation is highly valuable because it examines a project's progress while there is still time to act. It helps identify and resolve potential problems and, through specialist expertise and practical methodologies, helps organisations assess progress and achieve stronger results.

Final External Evaluation

Every project aims to create lasting impact and sustainably improve beneficiaries' lives. At the end of implementation, it is essential to assess the impact achieved over the project's lifetime. With specialist expertise and professionalism, we help organisations measure the impact of their actions and draw lessons from the completed project.

What your organisation receives

Evaluation report with verifiable evidence
Evaluation matrix and data collection instruments
Clean, documented database
Results presentation with actionable recommendations

How we work

We use mixed methods aligned with the OECD-DAC criteria (relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability), supported by experienced field teams and quality control at every stage.